The Real Truth About Working with Recruiters
February 10, 2010 at 6:45 pm 32 comments
When I first started my career as a recruiter, I worked and trained with a few “old-school” recruiters who had learned the staffing business in the days before internet searches and online job boards … when recruiters were called “Head Hunters” and had Rolodexes filled with prized contacts. It was all about who they knew. The implication of the term Head Hunter was that they only went after top talent – usually people who worked for their client’s competitors – and actually recruited them away from one company to come work for another! Some of the best of today’s recruiters still operate that way, only seeking out top talent through networking and personal contacts. Some of those old Head Hunters even imagined themselves to be the business world’s equivalent of a Jerry McGuire … agents who represented top talent, shopped them around and negotiated the best deals for their candidates. Needless to say, in today’s ultra-challenging, candidate-flooded job market, many recruiters have learned to adapt to new ways of doing business.
At the other end of the spectrum from the Head Hunters are the younger, much less experienced recruiters who never learned how to creatively source passive (employed, non-job-seeking) candidates. They only look at résumés from people who respond to their online job postings – the so-called “low hanging fruit.” Since most companies know how to do the same thing by posting their own ads and collecting those same résumés, recruiters who operate that way are finding fewer and fewer companies willing to pay them a fee for that type of recruiting.
Most modern recruiters fall somewhere in between those two models. As with any profession, there are good recruiters and bad recruiters. Yes, there are recruiters out there who lie, cheat, deceive, bait & switch, promise things they cannot deliver, and will pretty much do or say anything to get a placement and get paid. I’ve met some of those people, and their sleaze factor can be quite astounding! Unfortunately, those bad recruiters tend to give the entire profession a negative reputation. How can you tell the difference? Just like with any other business relationship, time will reveal the traits of a person worth working with: honesty, integrity, sincerely, responsiveness, timely follow-through, etc. Good recruiters treat everyone with respect, and care about the people they work with. They try to do the right thing, and look out for everyone’s best interest – their own, their client’s and their candidate’s.
There are a lot of myths and misconceptions out there about how recruiters work, and how job-seekers can best utilize them as a resource. There is also a lot of confusion among job-seekers about exactly what recruiters do, how they get paid, who they work for, how to approach them, what questions to ask, etc. As a veteran of the staffing industry, I’d like to set the record straight, bust some common myths, and give some advice on how to best utilize recruiters as a resource.
Recruiters come in many different flavors. There are Retained Recruiters who typically only work on very specialized high-end C-level positions, and get paid a flat fee for simply producing a certain number of highly qualified candidates – whether or not they get hired. There are “Temporary Staffing” or “Staff Augmentation” Recruiters who work primarily on short-term contract assignments for their clients. There are Corporate or Internal Recruiters who work directly for the companies who have the open jobs. And then there are 3rd Party Agency Recruiters. For the purposes of this article, I’m focusing only on 3rd-Party Agency Recruiters – the ones who work on permanent jobs, usually on a contingency basis. These recruiters work for independent agencies who contract their services to various companies who need help filling open jobs with very specific and often hard-to-find requirements. They search for candidates that match those requirements, and try to present only the top few most qualified candidates to their clients. They are paid on a commission basis if and only if their candidates are hired and after their client company pays their agency’s fee. Those fees are usually a percentage of their candidate’s first year salary (typically 20-25% – sometimes more, sometimes less.) So naturally it’s in their own best interest, as well as their candidate’s, to help negotiate the highest possible salary from their client during the offer stage.
MYTH: Recruiters Find Jobs for People
Wrong! Recruiters find People for Jobs! If you think about it, that’s a very different concept. Recruiters do not get paid by candidates, nor are they job counselors. Sure, they “counsel” the candidates that they choose to work with, help them refine their résumés, and prep & coach them on interview techniques. However, they are paid by client companies to find candidates to fill very specific positions with very specific (usually hard to find) requirements. Randomly contacting a recruiter with your unsolicited résumé, and saying “can you help me find a job” is NOT a good tactic … and most recruiters will not respond. I get at least two or three of those a week from people I cannot possibly help. On the other hand, answering a recruiter’s job posting with your résumé and a message that says “I match every requirement you’ve listed …” is a GOOD idea. Calling to follow-up is even better. The name of the game is matching your skills and experience to a specific job they are already working on. That’s what they get paid for! That’s why most recruiters don’t return calls or emails from candidates that don’t match all the requirements of their current job searches. For them, time is money, and they only make money on matches!
Is it Better to Apply Directly to a Company, or Go Through a Recruiter?
The answer depends on who you know at the company. If you’ve already networked your way to a decision-maker, and have a personal relationship there … go direct! If, on the other hand, you don’t know anyone there and you talk with a recruiter who has a personal relationship with a hiring manager … then the advantage goes to the recruiter! The company’s desire to avoid paying the recruiter’s fee might sometimes be a factor … but a personal relationship trumps that every time. Most good recruiters develop and nurture relationships with their clients over a long period of time. Those relationships are invaluable … they have the trust and attention of the decision-makers who are the hardest to reach. They can get you in front of the right people. That is one of the main advantages of using a good recruiter!
Industry-Specific Recruiters
Most Recruiters specialize in a specific industry, and only look for specific types of candidates. Some are more focused than others. For example, a recruiter may be a general IT Recruiter, looking for any and all technical positions. Others may be focused on a smaller subset of IT – for example, only .NET programmers, or only JAVA developers, or only Web Designers, etc. Others may focus on totally different industries. I’ve heard of Recruiting Firms that concentrate exclusively on very narrow industry specialties: HVAC Engineers, Paper and Pulp Industry Professionals, Hospitality Industry Executives, Copyright Lawyers, Corporate Controllers, Radiology Technicians … the list is literally endless. Needless to say, an industry-specific recruiter does not want to waste their time talking to candidates who do not fit their niche. Job-Seekers who want to find a recruiter to work with should figure out which agencies and/or recruiters specialize in their specific industry niche, and focus on getting on their radar.
How Do Recruiters Find Candidates that Match Their Job Requirements?
There are several ways that recruiters might find matching candidates: using sophisticated Boolean key-word searches, they first mine their electronic resources: they look in their own data base of collected résumés; they post their jobs (usually without identifying the client company) on the popular job boards, on Social Media sites, and on their own agency’s website and then screen applicants for matches; they search résumé banks that they pay to subscribe to, like Careerbuilder, Monster, etc.; they make extensive use of searches on all the free Social Networking sites like LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, etc. Finally, they do a LOT of old fashioned cold calling to people within their industry niche, asking everyone if they know of anyone else that fits their job requirements, and asking everyone they talk with for referrals. It’s a laborious time-consuming process where one person leads to another, to another, to another and so on. All along the way they collect résumés from potential candidates who may or may not fit the immediate job they are working on, but seem worth keeping on file for future searches in their specialty area.
What is the Best Way for a Job-Seeker to Use Recruiters as a Resource?
Try to identify an agency, or a specific recruiter who specializes in your industry niche, and put yourself “on file” there. Send them your résumé to get into their searchable electronic data base so that when a new job comes up, they’ll “find” you later during a future search. You should also regularly check that niche agency’s job posting on their own website, and look for jobs that match your background. If you do spot a matching job, contact the agency and ask which recruiter in their office is working on that search … and try to reach that specific person to alert them of your own matching qualifications. Needless to say, you should also keep your online profiles (Monster, Careerbuilder, LinkedIn, etc.) up to date and filled with as many “keywords” in your niche as possible. You want to make yourself “findable” when a recruiter does a search.
What Questions Should You Ask of a Recruiter Who Calls You About a Job?
► What company are they recruiting for? (If you’ve already applied directly to that same company, they would usually not be able to represent you there.) Find out everything the recruiter knows about that company. If they cannot tell you the name of the company, ask why. (If it’s truly a “confidential” search, OK … but more often than not it’s a trust issue, and failure to identify the client could be a red flag for a job-seeker.)
► What are the job requirements? Ask them to send you a job description. Help the recruiter see how you fit those requirements, if you do. Be honest about any requirements that you really don’t have.
► What is the salary range defined for the position? You should be honest and up front about your own salary history and the salary range you would accept going forward. If your salary history and expectations do not match the job’s defined range (or seem unrealistic) most recruiters will not consider it a match worth pursuing. Like it or not, it’s a primary factor recruiters use to decide who they’ll represent to their clients. [Read “Answering the Dreaded Salary Question” for more info on how to deal with this issue when working with recruiters.]
► What is the history of this position? (New or replacement … and if the latter, what happened to the person who left?)
► Who is the hiring manager, and how well does the recruiter know that person? What is their management style? What is the company culture like? Can you get any inside intelligence?
► How many other candidates is this recruiter representing to this job? Are there other agencies that are also sending candidates, or is this an "exclusive?"
► What is the client's hiring timetable? What steps are there – how many phone interviews and in-person interviews will there be, and with whom? When do they want someone to start? How long has this position been open? How high is their degree of “urgency” to full it?
► What is the next step? Will the recruiter definitely be sending your information to the client – and if so, when? How soon should you expect to hear back from the recruiter?
Good recruiters should be able to answer almost all of these questions and more. If they can’t answer those basic questions … then they probably don’t know their clients very well, and I would question whether or not you want them to represent you. Good recruiters will also be able to help you tweak your résumé to better fit the job specs, prep and coach you on how to successfully interview using their insider knowledge of the company and the decision-makers, and they will help you negotiate the best salary if and when an offer comes. Good recruiters will also follow through with things they say they will do, and will be good about keeping you informed with updates and progress reports. Expect good communication … and beware of anyone who suddenly stops returning your calls or emails — that’s a telltale sign of unprofessionalism that is certainly not limited to recruiters!
Also, always verify that the recruiter will never submit your résumé to any companies or jobs without your knowledge and approval. Believe it or not, that happens quite frequently. I’ve recruited many candidates over the years who swore they never even heard of my client company, only to find out later that the company had already received that person’s résumé from another recruiter! Not only did that make me look stupid, but more importantly it ruined that candidate’s chances of getting the job – most companies will automatically eliminate any candidate who is submitted from multiple sources. They don’t want to get into the middle of a turf war.
What NOT To Do When Working With Recruiters …
► Never ever agree to pay any money to a recruiting agency for their services, or agree to any future financial obligations – e.g. re-paying their fees if you leave a job before their guarantee period is up. Recruiters who ask for money from candidates are not to be trusted. Run away quickly, and don’t look back!
► Never do an “end-run” around a recruiter and apply directly to a job they told you about. That is extremely unethical, and almost never ends well. If, on the other hand, the recruiter does not submit you to their client company for whatever reason – then you have every right to go ahead and apply directly to that company on your own.
► Do not sign any documents that promise “exclusive representation” by a recruiter. You have every right to work with multiple recruiters (as long as they are not working on the same job with the same company) and to continue applying directly to other companies. You should, however, inform your recruiter of other opportunities you are working on – especially if you are actually interviewing elsewhere, and may be getting close to an offer at another company.
► Never lie to a recruiter about your qualifications, your experiences, your education, your salary history, or anything else! Be honest about everything, and expect the same in return.
► Finally, do not put all of your job hopes into working with any recruiter, no matter how good they are. The real truth about working with recruiters is that while they can be a great resource … the vast majority of job-seekers today will NOT find their next job through a recruiter. Job-Seekers should concentrate on their own networking activities designed to get them in front of decision-makers in their target companies. [Read “How to Network: A Step-by-Step Guide for Job-Searching” for more detailed information on how to do exactly that!]
Entry filed under: Advice for Job Seekers. Tags: job-seekers, networking, unemployment.





1.
Eddie | February 11, 2010 at 4:10 am
I find the content amusing and very insightful while at the same time intriguing. Most are already aware that recruiters help prospective candidates “brand” ourselves to maximize our leverage so as to land an interview which can potentially lead to a job offer. It has become very crucial to work “hand-in-hand” with these professionals to tap onto their network & credibility in the market place so as to extend & expand the reach candidates can gain with potential employers.
2.
Mary J. | February 11, 2010 at 2:13 pm
I read lots on recruiters and seen them on sites. I myself, wouldn’t use one. I don’t know of anybody who’s gotten employed thru one yet.
3.
Jim Gill | February 11, 2010 at 4:18 pm
Amen!
Thank you for reiterating and supporting what we tell our clients and candidates every day!
Thanks Michael!
4.
Rhonda Skalsky | February 11, 2010 at 5:54 pm
Hi Mike,
Have you ever thought about writing a book? These blogs are so thorough, thought provoking and informative.
Thanks fo much!
5.
Katherine moody | February 11, 2010 at 6:43 pm
This is a great post–comprehensive and lots of good points that are important for candidates to know.
If the search is with a retained recruiter, even if the candidate goes to a contact in the company, almost always the retained recruiter will be asked to work with that candidate. That way every candidate knows they have been through the same process. In 14 years of retained search, it never bothers me if a candidate uses other means to come to the attention of the company. Especially if it’s an employee referral–always a good thing.
If the external recruiter is a contingency recruiter, the company probably will not pass on any resumes that come to them directly. So that candidate has an advantage because they do not have a commission attached to their candidacy. Not nice to use the contingency recruiter to find out about the job and then go around them, however.
I think this is a great blog for job seekers and one worth spending some time on.
6.
Frederica Bolgouras | February 11, 2010 at 6:56 pm
Hi Mike,
You so right on all counts! Your work gives a clear picture to all who are seeking new opportunities and an understanding of the search world. Today, everyone is responsible for their own search. Recruiters do work for the client and many times candidates don’t understand that and want special attention. I always extend myself as they could become clients of mine some day and the point is to establish a good business relationship. Many times though, candidates try to push too hard or could ask inappropriate questions to score points. They are trying to “get in’ and stay close. It is important to always be professional and never compromise your integrity. Our searches were always confidential.
Thanks for the good read.
Best,
Frederica
7.
Phil Rosenberg | February 11, 2010 at 7:23 pm
Nice article Mike!
Your readers might find this article I wrote a while back about how to effectively work with recruiters, remembering the cardinal rule of recruiters – They work for the hiring manager, not the candidate… and a recruiter’s job isn’t to call you back.
See how you can make these rules work for you (rather than against you) at: http://recareered.blogspot.com/2008/02/inside-track-on-recruiters-top-10-tips.html
8.
David Bisignani | February 11, 2010 at 8:23 pm
Thank you for taking the time to write your blog. I enjoy reading it and have learned quite a bit from it! I look forward to each new post! Keep the good tips coming!
9.
RW Carsia | February 11, 2010 at 8:27 pm
This guy is so pragmatic, I can laugh through the pain of reading his stuff. Most of it is trueeeeeee and truer.
10.
Eric | February 11, 2010 at 9:26 pm
As always, very insightful. I appreciate your candor, and your very topical discussions.
11.
Steven Katz | February 12, 2010 at 1:34 pm
I agree with Michael. Recruiters do what is needed to get the person an interview. Most candidates don’t know how to write a resume or use the right “Buzz Words” to stir interest. Most don’t even know about “spell check” so it is our job to make sure all resume look good and hit the mark (without spelling mistakes). If I sent out the resume I received, I probably wouldn’t get as many interviews as I do. What I see that recruiters don’t do enough (which I train all recruiters to do) is once an interview is set-that’s when we really earn our keep by preparing them 100% for the interview-not just the address-who to speak with and a slap on the back-good luck! We should be experts on how to interview and how you handle yourself during that interview and the follow-up. The Interview is one of four steps in looking and getting a job. Resume, Interview, Prep and follow-up (close) are those 4.
12.
Amelia R | February 12, 2010 at 2:10 pm
Hi Mike – great stuff, thanks for sharing.
I am in a situation where I responded to a recruiter’s posting & was told that I was not a good fit for an interview. A month later I responded to a posting on a Right Management job alert & I have a face-to-face later today. I have found out that the hiring manager will be meeting with the recruiter’s candidates beforehand – which according to the recruiter, I was not a good fit. Now, I had no way of knowing that this way all about the same job because the recruiter did not disclose what company he was representing.
Interesting …
13.
Georg Toecker | February 12, 2010 at 3:47 pm
I do agree, as I ask recruiters all the time to review my resume before submitting and if they want me to make changes to it, I will, or if they want to make the changes, go ahead just send me a copy of it prior to the interview so I’m not suprised by something entirely different then what I wrote.
14.
Georg Toecker | February 12, 2010 at 3:51 pm
I like Michael’s way of using 3rd party recruiters. I used to take it personally when they didn’t call you back or you called and they didn’t take your call….but since I was laid off from Accountemps I have been working with temporary and 3rd party recruiters I do hear from them if there is a close match and since in my career I have done so many things I may have actually done something that gets me in the running that wasn’t on my original resume, had they not called and asked me if I had done this or that, as I had 95% of the other requirements.
15.
Gretchen Gunn | February 12, 2010 at 4:38 pm
Well said. It’s as though I read your blog before a I spoke this morning at a business group networking meeting. Reading your post when I got back to my desk reassured me that not only is this information topical, it will help promote equal business status and a better partnership among good staffing specialists and their clients which I believe are both employers and those seeking employment.
16.
Steve G | February 13, 2010 at 8:37 pm
Well written and spot on! Wish I had known this when I first started working with recruiters, head-hunters, etc.
17.
Leah Rosen | February 15, 2010 at 7:19 am
I read your blog post..good information. The bottom line is that developing a relationship with a recruiter is like anything else in your career. Some are good, some are bad. It’s a question of the work and follow up you put into the relationship. If they are bad, move on…if good, work with them and keep in touch after they place you. That’s key!
18.
Ruth Rivers | February 17, 2010 at 1:16 pm
Michael- you always tell like it is… Thanks
19.
Tom Crowley | February 17, 2010 at 3:00 pm
Good overview and insights, Thanks for sharing! I am in the job Market for the first time in 20 years and the new rules of the electronic age of job seeking have created a whole new game. The challenge from my perspective is to find and partner with good recruiters who have the reputation and contacts in my field (Building materials/construction) and who also have enough of these contacts to cover a meaningful portion of the job market
20.
Michael Rivard | February 18, 2010 at 7:52 am
Thank you!!! Excellent resources and as someone who has entered this unemployed arena, I certainly appreciate the insight on how to understand and leverage relationships with recruiters.
Mike Rivard
Sales Leader Now Available
21.
Jennie | February 18, 2010 at 12:47 pm
These are all great tips. Of course recruiters are working for those hiring! I guess I have been fortunate that the recruiters that I am working with do call me back or e-mail me. I have gotten some great feedback from my recruiters. Do I have a job…..no. But, at least the responsiveness of my contacts gives me hope.
22.
Ercelle | February 22, 2010 at 4:42 pm
This is a great article that answers many of my questions about working with recruiters. Straightforward, well-stated and very helpful. Thank you for sharing this information. In the current climate of unemployment, I am sure that many will benefit.
23.
Tim Krenn | February 23, 2010 at 10:01 am
Great article. I think that many job seekers don’t understand the full role of a recruiter. How they are compensated, what is their niche, and how are they being compensated for their search, are very important things to understand when reaching out to a recruiter. My favorite take-away from this article is to include within the cover letter that “I match every requirement that was listed…” How many times have I written the same basic cover letter with only changing the company and contact?? Too many times!! Great article and I will definitely follow your blogs moving forward.
24.
Anjali | February 23, 2010 at 10:29 am
Mike,
Very objective information on the pros and cons of working with recruiters.
Good tips to keep in mind in dealing with all types of recruiters.
Thanks.
25.
Bob Jackson | April 20, 2010 at 8:28 pm
2007: Optimism has been replaced by Hope.
2008: Hope has been replaced by reality.
2009: Reality has been replaced by frustration.
2010: Frustration has been replaced by anger.
We all need to be careful with whom and with the way we express ourselves
26.
Margaret Neville | April 21, 2010 at 11:30 am
I find Michael to be right on! His comments are always presented in a positive format. His information is very supportive and encouraging for those seeking employment and self empowerment! Thanks Michael for caring about us!
27.
Aaron | January 10, 2012 at 11:47 am
Great article, Michael! I had a follow-up question. If a recruiter represents you and the employer decides they aren’t interested, at that point, is it acceptable to contact the company directly? I had a situation where the recruiter told me my salary demands were to high. I relented and let the recruiter know I was willing to accept a lower salary, but she indicated that she was not going to inform the employer even though I was willing to be flexible on salary. What would be the best way to handle this situation?
28.
Michael Spiro | January 10, 2012 at 12:43 pm
Hi Aaron: Great question. The quick answer to your question is inform the recruiter who represented you. It’s best to let them know that you intend to contact her client directly before you potentially step on any toes or “blind-side” her. The recruiter’s refusal to pass along your willingness to be flexible on salary is curious. Several scenarios are possible. Perhaps there were other reasons they rejected you, and price was just the “excuse” they used. Perhaps the recruiter had another, stronger candidate who was closer to being hired, and she didn’t want to muddy things up by dropping your price. Perhaps the recruiter didn’t want to accept a lower fee (which is usually a percentage of your salary.) Or perhaps the recruiter didn’t want to put out the perception that you were desperate by changing your salary requirements after the fact. Once you state your salary requirements, it’s best to stick to your minimum. Also, knowing that you “relented” might make you seem like a risky placement who would be unhappy with the lower salary and be a risk for bolting if a better offer came along.
The question this raises for me is why would you want to contact a company that already said they were not interested in you? (It’s rarely just about money.) Doing so could not only potentially embarrass the recruiter who has the relationship with the hiring authority … but could also potentially make you look even worse to that company by being an annoying pest. You might be thinking “what have I go to lose, since they already rejected me?” Well, you’d be surprised. I’ve had candidates “go rouge” on me by doing just what you are suggesting. One even got to the face-to-face interview stage before being rejected. That guy thought he’d aced the interview and just couldn’t believe they were passing on him! He decided to contact the interviewer directly and plead for another chance! The result was that hiring authority called me (as the recruiter) and basically said “why is your candidate continuing to contact me after I already told you I was not interested? Tell him to lay off!” There’s no way they’d ever consider that guy for future positions after that behavior.
I suppose there might be a case where you don’t trust that the recruiter represented you properly (or at all) … and you want to contact the company yourself to verify that they did, indeed, consider you. That’s a long shot — but if that’s your reason, at least it’s understandable. There also may be a company that is so large that you are only being seen by one small department, and you want to contact someone in a totally different area. Again, more understandable. I still have to wonder, though, why you don’t just take no for an answer and move on to other more promising target opportunities.
Just my 2 cents.
29.
Chloe | January 13, 2012 at 7:59 am
You comment about not submitting an job application to the company that a recruiter brings to you. I am in a field that is narrow with only a few employer prospects in my professional and geographic community. After learning that my employer is closing its doors, I submitted resumes and created profiles with most of these companies. Within the past 6 months, I have applied for a job similar to the one the recruiter is looking to fill. I am a perfect candidate and meet all the criteria for the position the recruiter has and I have not applied for this specific job directly. The recruiter stopped all communication with me after submitting my profile and learning that I had applied for a similar job with the same company. If I go around the recruiter, and apply directly to the company I tarnish my relationship with the recruiter and it is unlikely that my application will receive the same attention. I feel screwed. I am willing to do whatever to get in front of the hiring manager. I would consider paying a finder fee to the recruiter.Is this wrong in this case? Are there alternatives?
30.
Michael Spiro | January 13, 2012 at 9:57 am
Chloe: If the recruiter has, indeed, stopped all communication with you … then I don’t think you need to worry about “tarnishing your relationship” with that person. It sounds like there is no relationship to tarnish! Your only alternative is to continue to pursue that job at your target company directly. You need to find another way to get to the hiring manager besides through the recruiter. My guess is that the recruiter learned that he/she will not get paid a fee for submitting you since your resume was already on file with that company’s HR people. That recruiter is more likely to make money by placing someone else there if you DON’T pursue the job on your own. That’s probably why they are not communicating with you. (Do NOT offer to pay any recruiter a “finder’s fee” — that would not even come close to the amount they might collect from a placement fee paid by the company — and there would still be no guarantee that you’d even get an interview, much less the actual job.)
31.
Robbie | March 19, 2012 at 6:10 pm
Glad I found this site-good stuff Michael.
To those high caliber recruiting professionals reading the blog, forgive me for saying so but the reputation and sentiment of others I talk to seems that recruiters in today’s market leave much to be desired. I’m not sure how he does it but recently one of my colleagues told me he is refusing to work with them-seems to me that often times you have little choice-I have to assume he is passing up opportunities?
Michael, my question…is there such a thing as a blacklist that a job seeker could be placed on in the recruiting world?
32.
Michael Spiro | March 19, 2012 at 6:16 pm
Robbie:
Nothing official … but it’s certainly possible to become known as someone that recruiters do not wish to work with — especially within a particular agency. Here’s a story from another blog article of mine: “I still remember a particular candidate a couple of years ago who was unhappy with the responses he was getting from one of my colleagues at the recruiting firm we worked for. He sent a long, nasty, ranting email to that recruiter, which culminated in him calling him an “asshat.” That term was so unusual, and so funny sounding … well, most of us in the office had never actually heard it before! That email was eventually forwarded over and over and over to almost every one of the hundreds of recruiters who worked at our firm across the country. His name became notorious as “the asshat guy” who no one would ever want to work with. Needless to say, that candidate was never considered for any future positions we worked on.”
-Michael