Explaining Short Job Stints and Employment Gaps
August 9, 2010 at 12:01 am 54 comments
There are many criteria that recruiters and HR professionals use to eliminate job applicants after screening their résumés. Recently I posted an article here on that topic [“The Brutal Truth on How Résumés Get Eliminated.”] That blog article became one of the most widely read postings on Recruiter Musings. Obviously, I touched a nerve there!
One of the potential problem areas I wrote about is job turnover. If your résumé’s job history shows too many short stints over a limited time period, the person screening it can read it as a negative: you might be a job-hopping flight risk … you seemingly can’t hold down a job … perhaps you don’t get along with others well … there may have been performance issues that got you fired – the imagination creates all kinds of possible scenarios! Likewise, significant unexplained gaps between jobs can be red flags that will get you eliminated. And finally, if you are not currently working and you’ve been out of work for a long time … well, I don’t have to tell you how awkward it is when someone asks you: “So, what have you been doing since you left your last job?” I thought it might be helpful to suggest some strategies that can be used to overcome those issues.
Too Much Job Turnover
There may be perfectly valid reasons for having a lot of jobs within a short period. I would advise briefly listing the reasons for those short job stints right next to the dates on your résumé to avoid this obvious red flag. The idea here is to be pro-active, and answer their questions about why you left each job before those questions are even asked. It’s a simple thing, and yet very few people do it. You don’t need to go into long-winded or detailed explanations. All you need is a brief phrase, in parenthesis, following the dates of each short-lived position. For example: “Laid Off Due To Economic Circumstances” … or “Position Was Eliminated” … or “Company Went Out of Business,” etc. What this does is provide the screener with a perfectly valid explanation for the short stint, and eliminates the possibility that they will imagine something much worse – i.e., that you were fired for cause, poor performance, etc. (Of course, if you actually were fired for cause … well, that’s another story!)
Unexplained Gaps Between Jobs
Unlike a job application, a résumé is not a legal document and there is no requirement that it must contain a complete history of everything you’ve ever done. It should be truthful … but it’s up to you to decide what to include or not include. Here’s a suggestion: the dates listed next to each job do not have to include the months – instead, you can show them as a range of years. That can often avoid the red flag of seeing brief periods of unemployment between jobs. Likewise, if there are jobs in your work history (especially if they were short-lived) that were unrelated to your main industry or niche … there’s no reason you can’t leave those off the résumé. You only need to feature your most relevant positions – and usually only go back about 10 years. Many people take positions outside of their industry while between jobs as a temporary way of maintaining an income until they find something in their field. Others have jobs earlier in their chronology that are also outside of their current target industry. Listing those “side-trips” can sometimes be distracting to a screener who is only focused on looking for experience in one particular field.
The one caution I’ll add here, is that sooner or later almost every company will have you fill out an official job application form. Unlike your résumé, that application is actually a legal document that you must sign … so don’t leave anything off of that one. Be sure every job, employment date, salary, and educational degree that you list is accurate. It’s better to leave something blank, than to guess or make something up. Background checks will inevitably uncover incorrect information … and inconsistent or false information on an application will look like you’ve intentionally lied. That almost always results in the applicant being eliminated. I’ve seen job offers withdrawn for things like candidates listing the wrong dates of employment or school graduations, exaggerating salary histories, fabricating educational degrees, etc. Just tell the truth!
Currently Not Working
Believe it or not, there actually are companies out there who have made it known that they won’t consider hiring unemployed candidates! I know – it sounds outrageous … and that’s a topic for another blog. [See “'Unemployed Need Not Apply' - Working Around This Scary Message.”] Nevertheless, it’s obviously in any job-seeker’s best interest to not appear to be unemployed. So, if it’s been a long while since you left your last full-time job, how do you handle that? Different people handle this issue different ways on their résumés. Here are three common solutions:
Volunteer Work: Many job-seekers turn to volunteer work as a way of staying busy and feeling useful while unemployed. Besides the obvious personal benefits that come from the act of giving of yourself, sharing your time, helping others and upping your “karma” score, volunteering can often get your “foot in the door” with a company that might potentially hire you in the future. Showing people what you can do, how well you can do it, and demonstrating your exceptional work ethic – even if it’s not in a paid position – can bring you to the attention of professionals who notice such things, and reward them when opportunities open up. If you are volunteering somewhere, then list that volunteer position on your resume as your current position. However, do NOT use the term “volunteer!” Simply list the organization and your title or role, describe your function, relevant skills used, and any accomplishments there just as you would with any of your other jobs. Let the fact that you are not being paid wait for an interview, where you should then disclose it.
Consulting (Contract) Work: Depending on your field, many job-seekers choose to take temporary assignments, contract work, or other “1099″ (non-employee) jobs. People who engage is this type of work often refer to themselves as “consultants.” Very often, those contract jobs have the possibility of turning into full-time positions. Again, list those temporary “consulting” positions on your resume … and highlight the relevant skills you used, and any accomplishments achieved at those temporary assignments. If your period of “consulting” was not long-term or consistent, list it as one long job period (from the last full-time job till the present) and under that “Consulting” heading list some individual assignments without specifying dates. Again, leave the exact details of when and for how long you actually worked at each assignment for either an interview or an official job application. The goal here is to look like you’ve been keeping busy and working in your field. [Read: “Contract / Consulting Jobs Explained … Available in Three Different Flavors” for more information on this topic.]
Self-Employment: These days, more and more job-seekers are turning to starting their own businesses. There’s even a media-coined term for this phenomenon: “Entrepreneur by Necessity.” If you are in that category – by all means list it on your resume as your current occupation. Whether or not you’ve actually earned any income from your company or had any actual success in your venture, listing a self-owned company on your resume is much better than having a large gap of current unemployment without any explanation. And, of course, it’s the perfect answer to that question: “So, what have you been doing since you left your last job?”

Entry filed under: Advice for Job Seekers. Tags: job-seekers, resume.




1.
Christine Francois | August 9, 2010 at 12:14 pm
Excellent advice Michael and the videos made me laugh…great way to start ANY day!
2.
Karin Moss | August 9, 2010 at 1:52 pm
Hello, Michael -
I just wanted to tell you how much I enjoy your blog. Not only is it evident that you are a “mensch” but the information you provide is extremely valuable.
Thanks for your insights!
Karin Moss
3.
Nancy Patterson | August 9, 2010 at 2:11 pm
A quick comment on this excellent subject…
I am one of those applicants who has gaps and short employment history. It’s not what I planned, it just turned out that way. During my last 6-month search, I was often asked why was I still available. I would politely smile and say:
When the right fit, location, and compensation all line up, I’m looking forward to accepting that offer. It just has not happened yet.
For me, that answer worked. I found I was more receptive to a company that was more interested in what I could do for them today and moving forward vs where I had been. You cannot change history. Just learn to skip around it confidently.
Going into any interview I wanted to know if my skills could fix their problem, not get me a job.
4.
Pooja Mishra | September 27, 2010 at 11:35 pm
Hey Nancy,
I agree with your point. I believe that employer should focus on present that what value i can add to their business rather than focusing on past and making the judgments without knowing the reasons. They can also confirm through reference check the reasons for a candidate’s leaving the job.
Thanks for posting.
Best
Pooja
5.
Pegg Milroy | August 9, 2010 at 7:14 pm
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the answer to resume employment gaps-I especially like that your opinion of not using the word “Volunteer” matches mine. You can say it in the interview- but do not put it in writing in the resume.
Although I know I am guilty of it also- one of the best ways to shoot yourself in the foot in job seeking is TMI (Too Much Information.)
You have one of the best blogs out there- proud to be a fellow Clevelander.
Pegg Milroy
6.
TK | August 11, 2010 at 8:09 am
What about the opposite side of the fence. If you have been with the same employer for 10 – 15 years, is that a positive or negative?
7.
Michael Spiro | August 11, 2010 at 8:26 am
TK:
I don’t think a 10-15 year job stint is necessarily either a negative or a positive. It all depends on how one looks at it. There is certainly something to be said for job stability and employee loyalty. The more important issue would be whether or not you had increasing responsibilities within that one long job time span … and if you did – to show that on your résumé. And, of course, how much your particular skills are in demand in today’s market.
- Michael
8.
David P | August 11, 2010 at 9:17 am
With today’s economy and so many people consulting, is this as much of an issue as in previous decades? Most companies have a strict time limit on consultants thereby forcing a job change every 9-24 months depending on the length of the contract. There are also numerous cases where someone obtains permanent employment only to have the company go through a restructuring or actually go under shortly thereafter. In my opinion, as long as you are not truly job hopping, being upfront in a job interview is the way to go. A hiring manager would have to be ignorant of the current job market to not take these conditions into account when reviewing a resume or a candidate.
My two cents.
9.
Michael Spiro | August 11, 2010 at 9:28 am
David:
If someone is “consulting” (1099 contract jobs) then this is a non-issue. Those types of jobs are, by definition, temporary assignments that do not require further explanation. It’s when a person has a series of short-lived permanent positions that the red flags go up. Yes, with today’s economy there are many valid explanations for short stints. I’m simply suggesting that it’s better to provide those explanations on the resume to avoid being eliminated during the initial screening stage. “Being up front in a job interview” is all fine and good … but that only works if you get past the initial review and get invited to actually have an interview!
- Michael
10.
Al | August 15, 2010 at 2:20 pm
This is an interesting discussion and you both make excellent points. As a 20-year consultant, I think it is still important how it is presented regardless of the time. Yes I have had many project for many clients over the years but all of which was operated under a few major firms (ie, E&Y, Fujitsu, IBM), thus technically not much change at all. I think it is reasonable for a consultant to average 2-years at a position is ideal, which is longer than the average cio term. the fact is most projects are 3-6 months vs those that are 12-18 months. So yes, there are dangers to showing too many short term jobs, for all the reasons previously stated, but also issues with those that have been with a single firm for 15 – 18 – 20 – 25+ years, as they may have trouble adapting to a new enviornment, organization, corp culture, etc.. The net net is that there needs to be a balance and how you spin it, but always be truthful to prospective employers, clients and most importantly yourself…
11.
Mike Perry | August 12, 2010 at 9:42 am
Michael –
Just started reading your blog and love it!
I’ve been a hiring manager for over 30 years, and do a lot of pro-bono job search coaching along with presentations at job seekers groups. Your comments and suggestions really “hit the mark” and address very well many of the questions and concerns I continue to hear from job seekers.
The people who put the effort into incorporating your ideas into their job search strategies will find it much easier to differentiate themselves from the dozens or hundreds of other candidates seeking the same position.
Thank you..!!
12.
shebamarx | August 12, 2010 at 7:34 pm
So, what do you think is a short stint? Is it 2 years? One year?
13.
Michael Spiro | August 12, 2010 at 10:09 pm
That’s a very good question … and I don’t have an exact answer. I think it depends somewhat on how many jobs you’ve had over a period of time. For example, 5-10 jobs over a four or five year period (and I’ve seen that scenario many times) seems like a red flag. On the other hand, a single short job (one-year or less) sandwiched in between two multi-year stints is less problematic, and probably easier to explain. There is no hard and fast rule.
14.
Nicola James | August 17, 2010 at 5:31 pm
Good stuff, Michael, and spot on. Very relevant and as another recruiter, I heartily agree with your points.
15.
Sarah | August 18, 2010 at 6:34 pm
Michael – saw your comment on LinkedIn (and looked back at some of your “musings”) and found it very helpful. I worked with the same company for about 8 years and have now been unemployed for over a year (only recently seeking employment). One of my biggest fears is explaining that gaping hole on my resume. I recently signed up for 2 volunteer positions and I’m glad to see that as one of your suggestions for people who are unemployed. It’s nice to know I’m doing something right!
16.
Pooja Mishra | September 27, 2010 at 11:31 pm
Hi Michael,
Just loved your blog. I have a question.
I have done my MBA-HR in 2009 and as you know it was a recession year so though i got a job but not what i wanted. So, i left my first job after working for 11 months and joined an HR consultancy. I loved this job but i had to leave again b’coz of some family issues i had to relocate to other city where they dont have any office. Here, i worked for 4 months. Now, i am unemployed and looking for a job and finding it very tough to get a call for an interview.
As you said, we can write the reasons briefly in the resume itself, but would employers accept the fact that in the initial year of one’s career somebody can leave job for family issues?
Would it be a good idea to write in my resume?
Pooja.
17.
Michael Spiro | September 28, 2010 at 5:48 pm
Pooja:
That’s a tough one. I guess it depends on the nature of the “family issues” you mentioned. Simply saying “left due to family relocation” might be sufficient. Just be prepared to explain it further when asked.
Michael
18.
John Golby | August 26, 2011 at 8:44 am
As an illustrator and having worked in the Social Services I too have gaps in my employment but I just don’t see what the gaps have to do with anyone else.I recently signed with an agency who wanted to know what I was doing for three months in 2006 – no wonder there is unemployment and the fact that I was in Hong Kong is my own business, as long as my CRB is in the clear that should be good enough.
19.
Michael Spiro | August 26, 2011 at 11:03 am
John:
I agree that a 3-month gap between jobs is very insignificant — and any recruiter who focuses on such a short period of time is probably very inexperienced. On the other hand, it would be naive to assume that longer gaps between jobs will not be a problem for you as a job-seeker. You many not think they are a important … but as I said in my blog article, significant unexplained gaps absolutely do raise red flags for recruiters, HR professionals and company decision-makers. Without reasonable explanations, people often assume very negative things about why you were out of work for so long, and may consider you a hiring risk. Like it or not, fair or unfair … that’s just the way it works. You might be passed over for job opportunities because of such gaps without ever knowing why. And as to your trip to Hong Kong — I’m not sure what that’s all about, but if it was a personal trip unrelated to your job history, then it should not be on your resume at all — and should certainly not be a topic of discussion with a recruiter. Having your CRB (Criminal Record Bureau, right?) be “in the clear” is an unrelated issue, and has nothing do to with any employment gaps on your resume.
-Michael
20.
Nancy P | August 26, 2011 at 11:07 am
I have had many ‘gaps’ in my employment history. During an interview, I address the gaps quickly and work to bring the conversation to my strengths and what I can do for the employer today. If I have yet to find the perfect role and there is a lengthy timeframe my standard answer is: when the location, finances, and fit line up, I’m ready to accept an offer. One cannot erase the past and if an employer is really all that concerned about a gap, they’re not the best fit for me. Too many rules
21.
Robert | March 17, 2012 at 1:16 pm
I, for the first time in my life, have been employed with two different companies in a period of 14 months- 1 job for eight months and was recruited for a job I accepted for only six months-these certainly define a short stint of employment I would imagine.
If this is considered a red flag, does a previous history of longer employment over shadow these?
If during a short stint there are considerable accomplishments that are shown on the resume does this also help lessen the impact?
22.
Michael Spiro | March 19, 2012 at 2:38 pm
Robert:
Showing a prior history of long employment, and also listing significant accomplishments are both good things that may or may not counter-balance the potential negative impact of two short back-to-back job stints that follow. The more important question you need to address (not mentioned at all in your comment to me) is WHY you left each of those two jobs after such short periods. Deciding to leave a job simply because you found a better opportunity after only 8 months could be seen as a red flag to some. (What’s to prevent you from leaving your next job quickly if a better offer comes along?) And then, why did that second job last for only 6 months? Did you quit? Were you let go for cause? Was it an unexpected lay-off? The explanations you provide are key to how those short stints will be perceived by anyone reviewing your job history. No one wants to hire someone who might be a flight risk.
-Michael
23.
Robbie | March 19, 2012 at 7:03 pm
Understood.
The explanation simply is for the eight month stint is the company misrepresented the area-geographically disadvantaged & insufficient housing, crime, etc.I was expected to relo (at my expense) however, during the time my family was trying to sell our home (I had an apartment) I realized I could not move them to this place.
The six month term was one in which I’ll forever hang my head in embarrassment-I violated a company policy (A minor one-but none the less) and was released. Their feet were held to the fire on this one as there was an employee who was making a big deal of why a member of mgmt was not being held accountable-regardless I have to own my mistake.
I’ve enjoyed a successful career w/out blemish and full of accomplishments, however, this last job is (with a company for which I have great respect) will personally forever haunt me.
The glimmer is that I will get great recommendations from the company officers, which I hope will minimize the damage…
Thanks
24.
Sarah | April 25, 2012 at 12:37 pm
I have a question.
I’m on the younger end of the job hunting spectrum. Most of my jobs have been short tenure, but explainable (I left one to relocate to the city where my fiance lived, one was a summer contract position). One however, I left because the job was not at all what I expected and I was not equipped to handle the working environment, or what I felt like was a lack of training and support.
While the first two are explainable, I’m not sure how to explain the last (and most recent) one.
If it helps, I also do freelance work and have since 2009. (I have recommendations from past clients).
How do I address this on my resume?
Thank you!
25.
Michael Spiro | April 28, 2012 at 9:49 am
Sarah:
That’s a tough one. I would not try to explain that last one on your résumé. Depending on how you portray your “freelance work” section, you may not have to even list that last job at all — especially if it was a short stint. Freelance work (much like “consulting”) can serve as an umbrella on your resume to cover a long period of time during which you may have done work for multiple clients. Save your explanation of why your last job was a bad fit for an interview. Trying to explain it on your résumé the way you did in your question will raise too many red flags.
Michael
26.
John | May 1, 2012 at 8:58 pm
Great post, Michael.
I have a question for you. I “rolled” a short team employment, 6 months, into my next long team job, 6 years and 8 months. So, in fact, I only worked at my present job for 6 years and 2 months. But my resume stated month/year. How should I address this issue on my resume?
Thanks
27.
Michael Spiro | May 2, 2012 at 2:21 pm
John:
I don’t really understand what you are asking. Do you want to know if it’s OK to combine the short stint with the longer job? (Sometimes that makes sense — for example, if it’s a contract job that falls under the umbrella of a consulting period of work experience, if it’s a different position at the same company as the job that you are combining it with, etc.) How should you “address this issue” on your resume? I’m not sure what that even means. If you are asking me to tell you how to explain the short stint — I have no idea! Only you know the answer as why you left that job after only 6 months. Oh, and why not simply change the format of your entire resume to using only years and not months at all. Would that solve your problem?
-Michael
28.
John | May 2, 2012 at 4:01 pm
Sorry about the confusion.
Say I worked at company A from Jan to Apri in 2005. Then I started at B from May 2005 until now. So officially I work at B for 7 years. However, I put down 7 years and 4 months on my resume for company B under the advice from my wife.
So, the question is how do I explain the “gap” when an employment verification is done and if my future employer finds the gap.
Thanks
29.
Michael Spiro | May 2, 2012 at 5:53 pm
You should re-read the two paragraphs in the blog above under the heading: “Unexplained Gaps Between Jobs.” As I explained there, a resume is not a legal document, and does not have to list EVERYTHING you’ve done. Just list years, and not months. Don’t include the 4-month job at all if it was not significant. (Your wife’s advice was well-intended, but wrong — you should not combine unrelated jobs or change employment dates.) On the other hand, filling out a formal job application is another story. That must include everything, and it must be accurate — including the actual start and end dates of each and every job you’ve had. A background check will, indeed, include employment verification which must match that application you fill out. Discrepancies between your application and your actual job history will kill your chances of getting hired. The only “gap” you should have to explain is if you had an extended period of unemployment.
30.
Cyndee | June 2, 2012 at 1:22 pm
Hi Michael,
Great info!! I recently had a job and was let go. It lasted less than a year and I’ve now been unemployed about as long. I am really concerned as to the negative connotation and want to just leave it off my resume. Will this “bite me in the ….” if I do? In over 30 years, I have had many, many successful work experiences, but lost 2 jobs (after all, how can you go through life and not make any enemies, especially in senior management of politically charged companies) – but they seem to be “cursing” me in moving forward. I could really use some advice here. Thanks
31.
Michael Spiro | June 4, 2012 at 11:31 am
Cyndee:
It seems to me that if you leave off your last job, you’ll end up appearing to have a 2-year period of current unemployment instead of just one. Obviously that would not look too good! Better to offer up a simple explanation of why that last job ended — if such an explanation exists.
-Michael
32.
Mary | June 14, 2012 at 1:08 am
Hi Michael,
Thanks for your great advice! After over 8 years of working with the same company, I recently had two short stays in new companies which are hurting my chances for a job.
I’ve an excellent record of accomplishments at my 8 year job. The short stays were not what I planned for at all and were unexpected. The first stay was 4 months at a well known firm. I was being given greater responsibility but got let go when I noticed my supervisor underbilling clients and naively brought it up to management. There was some internal politics (half the firm was let go during this period) and I was asked to resign. The 2nd stay I found 6 months later. They paid me twice the market salary but it lasted 1 month.
How do you advise I cover the period after my 7 year job on my resume? Should I leave these two short stays off and state I was consulting?
My stay of 4 months is in a firm relevant and well known to what I currently seek. I’ve learnt to be really careful about a good fit with the firms I join. These events are really hurting my chances for another position.
33.
Michael Spiro | June 14, 2012 at 9:46 am
Mary:
Based on what you’ve written, I’d say you should list the 4-month job (especially if it’s relevant to your niche) and leave off the 1 month stint — that’s probably too short to put on a resume, and it might raise more red flags than you can explain. If you just list years, and not months, then the shortness of that 4-month job will not be so obvious. I would not say that you were “consulting” unless those jobs were actually contracts as opposed to permanent direct-hire positions. I’d also try to list brief, neutral-sounding explanations for why you left the 8-year job as well as the 4-month job. Something like “company-wide layoffs” might work. Save the more detailed explanations (your underbilling boss and the politics, etc.) for a live interview. Hope that helps.
-Michael
34.
ana jade | September 25, 2012 at 9:47 pm
Hello Michael,
I have resigned from two jobs this year (the first one after 4 days and the second one after 4 months). I recently resigned from a job after 4 months because the job was not at all what I expected and I was not equipped to handle the stressful environment with absolutely no training and no support/guidance from management. Before that, I was unemployed for another 4 months because the company I’d been with was acquired by another company and my team was moved to another city. I was able to find another job and resign a few weeks before the acquisition; however, that job did not work out and I made the decision to leave after four days because, again, it was not what I expected. I’d stayed with the company that was acquired for a year and a half and another company before that for around two years. If I leave off both short term employments from my resume (4 days and 4 months), I will have around 8 months of unemployment on my resume. In the meantime, I have gone back to school for additional training in my field and and hope to earn a certificate soon (I already have a master degree). As you can imagine, I am not getting any responses to my job applications. Is there still hope for me? Should I leave these two jobs off my resume? Include only the 4 months one? Please help.
-Ana
35.
Michael Spiro | September 27, 2012 at 10:31 am
Ana:
I’m not sure what to tell you. You are right — two 4-month stints in a row do not look good to most reviewers. (The 4-day stint is a no-brainer … leave it off!) Saying that the one company was acquired as a reason for you leaving is very much acceptable … but the second one where you left because “it was not what you expected,” etc., is a tougher one to easily explain. Leaving one or both jobs off your résumé is certainly one option — and you could legitimately say you were in school during the 8-month “gap.” That might get you in the door for more initial interviews. But sooner or later those jobs will need to be revealed and explained. Good luck!
-Michael
36.
jovy | October 25, 2012 at 5:02 am
how about when you just work at a bank for two months, do i need to put it in my resume? because i don’t know if my future employer will eventually know about it if i will not put it in my resume, then would think that i’m hiding something and would be the cause of my disqualification from the position. or if i’m going to declare that two-month-job, if that will be my disadvantage in landing a job. pls help
37.
Michael Spiro | October 27, 2012 at 12:49 pm
Jovy:
Leaving a 2-month job off of your résumé is not a big deal. Résumés are not legal documents, and there is no requirement that they include every job you’ve ever had. However, at some point you may be asked to fill out and sign an official job application for a potential employer which includes a complete job history. You will certainly have to disclose that 2-month job on such an application, since unlike the résumé, that application form is a legal document. Background checks will uncover any discrepancies on such a job history, and anyone can disqualify you if you lie by omission. The more important question for you to answer/explain to any prospective employer is why you left that bank job after only 2 months?! Sooner or later you’ll need to have a satisfactory answer to that one!
-Michael
38.
ash | December 10, 2012 at 5:04 pm
Hi…
I resigned job 6 months before. i worked on executive level in commercial dept. I don’t get a job from last six months similar to my job profile. Now i have 6 months gaps in two jobs. Pls advice me how i justify to employer with good reason .
Thx in advance.
39.
Michael Spiro | December 10, 2012 at 5:26 pm
As I wrote in the blog, you need to explain WHY you “resigned job 6 months before” … and what you’ve been doing between jobs (other than looking for work.) I cannot advise you further based on the minimal information you wrote here.
40.
dev | February 15, 2013 at 7:29 pm
My first job is 3 years and did my masters degree and had a job for 1.5 yrs, coz of fiancee i moved and got a job n stayed der for 3.5 yrs. Now i am in a diff job for 2.5 yrs. Is this considered as a short stint, coz one of the VP asked me this question in an interview “looks like my average tenure is only 3 yrs, so vl u leave the company after 3 yrs”. Do u think this is normal?
41.
Michael Spiro | February 16, 2013 at 8:43 am
Dev:
No, I do not think that two or three years at different jobs necessarily looks bad. That’s probably more the average than longer stints. I’d be more worried if there were multiple jobs that lasted one year or less.
And by the way … I certainly hope that you don’t use those lazy text abbeviations (“coz” instead of “because” or “u” instead of “you”, etc.) in normal business communications. It makes you look extremely unprofessional, and can be a huge turnoff for potential employers.
Michael
42.
Nicole | March 5, 2013 at 6:21 pm
Hello,
Thank you for such a great selection of information. I am attempting to re-enter the work force after an extended absence. I haven’t worked for approximately 5 years. I left my previous employment because my husband needed to move for work and then we had several children. I was wondering how to handle this big gap in either a resume or cover letter. Prior to our move, I had worked for the same company for approximately 7 years, advancing from an entry level position to VP.
Thanks!
43.
Michael Spiro | March 6, 2013 at 5:45 pm
Nicole:
There are several ways to approach your situation on a resume and/or a cover letter. On way would be to simply not list anything after your last position, and hope you are not eliminated before you have the chance to explain it. Of course, the danger in that approach is that someone may like your prior background, but might be wary of the “red flag” of the missing last 5 years. Personally, I’d advise simple honesty. I’d explain that 5-year period for exactly what it was. Say: “Took time off to raise a family.” Then just be clear about the fact that you are now ready to re-enter the work force — and explain why, if possible. Sooner of later that truth will come out. I think it’s better to be up front about it and let the reader decide if such a scenario is acceptable to them. You may not land at the same VP level you left … but you also need to state that you are OK with that (if you are) and shoot for a realistic re-entry point in your field. You should also anticipate, and be prepared to overcome the objection you’ll probably get that your skills are not “current” after being away from the work for so long.
I hope that is helpful advice.
Michael
44.
Hannah | March 23, 2013 at 10:30 am
hi michael i am currently looking to return to work after a year and a half out after being pregnant and having my son i am writing my resume and i am struggling with how to include this. thanks in advance
45.
Michael Spiro | March 23, 2013 at 2:20 pm
Hannah:
My answer to you is about the same as the one I gave to “Nicole” a few comments back: There are several ways to approach your situation on a resume and/or a cover letter. On way would be to simply not list anything after your last position, and hope you are not eliminated before you have the chance to explain that recent gap in work time. Of course, the danger in that approach is that someone may like your prior background, but might be wary of the “red flag” of the missing last year and a half. Personally, I’d advise simple honesty. I’d explain that recent period for exactly what it was. Say: “Took time off to raise a family.” Then just be clear about the fact that you are now ready to re-enter the work force — and explain why, if possible. Sooner of later that truth will come out. I think it’s better to be up front about it and let the reader decide if such a scenario is acceptable to them. You should also anticipate, and be prepared to overcome the objection you’ll probably get that your skills may not be “current” after being away from the work for so long.
I hope that is helpful advice.
Michael
46.
shache | May 9, 2013 at 12:13 pm
Hello Michael,
Thanks for your information, very helpful. Below is my situation, need your further advice if possible.
I have been working under one company for 12 years and in 2010, I decided to resign and went to pursue a degree. After almost two years, I graduated and managed to get a job in May 2012 but I worked only for about 5 months as I found a higher pay job and joined another company in Nov 2012. But never expected, after 5 months, I resigned again due to the boss not really appreciate my hard works & still claim my performance not to their expectation.
If I include these two short term employments in my resume, it will reflect a two 5-months stints in a row in my resume, so should I include both ? If yes, what’s the best way to present in my resume and what to state for the reasons of leaving for both jobs ?
47.
Michael Spiro | May 9, 2013 at 2:21 pm
Shache:
Leaving both short jobs off your resume would give you a 10 month gap to explain. That will be a problem. And neither of the two reasons you gave for leaving each of those jobs after only 5 months sounds very reasonable. Leaving the first one because you found a higher paying job will raise a red flag to any recruiter or potential employer: if they hire you, won’t you just leave again after a short time if you find something better that pays more? And leaving that second job because your employer claimed your performance was not up to their expectation is an even bigger red flag! Past performance issues will always be a huge concern to anyone considering hiring you, no matter how long you worked somewhere. I would advise you to leave such explanations OFF your resume, and wait until you are asked in an interview to provide the details. Good luck.
Michael
48.
alishea | May 9, 2013 at 9:50 pm
Hello,
I have question on how to explain a gap of 10 months where I was a part-time student and it also include the summer months. During this time I went to school and was very actively looking for employment. I was having difficulty because of my limited availability wasn’t as open as the companies wanted. Also, I have a couple of short gaps 2 and 3 months that occur at times that I am having difficultly explaining. One gap (2 months) was just after being let go and I was simply looking for employment. Another 2 month gap was just after working during the holiday season for 2 months. I was a a student as this time and also very actively looking for employment. The last 3 month gap was just this last year after graduating from college. I was vary actively looking for employment it just took longer than I expected mostly because of the economy and so many other job seekers also applying to the some position. Thanks.
Alishea
49.
Michael Spiro | May 9, 2013 at 11:42 pm
Alishea:
I wouldn’t worry about short stints that occurred during your college years. Most employers understand the nature of college students’ schedules and work-study, part-time, summer or holiday jobs, etc. Those situations should not need further explanation. Likewise, spending a few months after graduating looking for a job is also very understandable, and should not raise concerns.
-Michael
50.
alishea | May 10, 2013 at 1:01 am
Thank you. This helps a lot.
51.
alishea | May 10, 2013 at 1:19 am
I have another question that is not related to employment gaps. I worked as a nanny for a lady. The end was very messy and I am unsure if I should put that I quit or that she let me go. Both things happened at the same time and I didn’t find employment again for 10 months due to being a student. How is the best way to explain this on an application?
Thank you,
Alishea
52.
Michael Spiro | May 10, 2013 at 10:36 am
Alishea:
Unless you plan a career as a Child Care professional, your work as a nanny for an individual family probably does not need to be on your resume at all. I don’t know what your career goals are, but I imagine you should be creating a professional resume aimed at the business world. Only include things that directly relate to the field in which you are pursuing employment. Don’t focus so much on gaps during your student years or jobs outside of your field. Think more about what you want to do, career-wise — and then try to fill your resume with things related to that career … things that would demonstrate your skills and attract an employer in that field.
-Michael
53.
shache | May 9, 2013 at 11:24 pm
Thanks for your advice, Michael.
One more question, can employer’s find out our job history if we omitted from a job application?
54.
Michael Spiro | May 9, 2013 at 11:37 pm
Shache:
An omitted job may or may not be discovered if the employer does a background check on you. It depends on how thorough the background checking company’s methods are. It is always safer to be honest and complete on any official job application.
-Michael